Книги

Кто за главного? Свобода воли с точки зрения нейробиологии

22
18
20
22
24
26
28
30

The President"s council on bioethics (2004). An overview of the impact of neuroscience evidence in criminal law. См.: https://bioethicsarchive.georgetown.edu/pcbe/background/neuroscience_evidence.html

240

Scalia A. (2002) Atkins v. Virginia (00-8452) 536 U. S. 304. См.: https://law.cornell.edu/supct/html/00-8452.ZO.html

241

SnEad O. C. (2006) Neuroimaging and the courts: standards and illustrative case index. См.: http://ncsc.org

242

TalaiRach P. T., TouRnoux P. (1988) Co-planar stereotaxic atlas for the human brain. 3-D proportional system: an approach to cerebral imaging (P. VII). NY: Thieme Medical Publishers.

243

MillER M. B. et al. (2002) Extensive individual differences in brain activations associated with episodic retrieval are reliable over time. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 14 (8): 1200-1214.

244

DoRon C., Gazzaniga M. S. (2009) Neuroimaging techniques offer new perspectives on callosal transfer and interhemispheric communication. Cortex. 44 (8): 1023-1029.

245

PuTman M. C. et al. (2009) Cortical projection topography of the human splenium: hemispheric asymmetry and individual difference. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 22 (8): 1662-1669.

246

DEsmuRgET M. et al. (2009) Movement intention after parietal cortex stimulation in humans. Science. 324 (811): 811-813.

247

BRass M., HaggaRd P. (2008) The what, when, whether model of intentional action. Neuroscientist. 14 (4): 319-325.

248

BRass M., HaggaRd P. (2007) To do or not to do: the neural signature of self-control. Journal of Neuroscience. 27 (34): 9141-9145.

249