The President"s council on bioethics (2004). An overview of the impact of neuroscience evidence in criminal law. См.: https://bioethicsarchive.georgetown.edu/pcbe/background/neuroscience_evidence.html
241
SnEad O. C. (2006) Neuroimaging and the courts: standards and illustrative case index. См.: http://ncsc.org
242
TalaiRach P. T., TouRnoux P. (1988) Co-planar stereotaxic atlas for the human brain. 3-D proportional system: an approach to cerebral imaging (P. VII). NY: Thieme Medical Publishers.
243
MillER M. B. et al. (2002) Extensive individual differences in brain activations associated with episodic retrieval are reliable over time. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 14 (8): 1200-1214.
244
DoRon C., Gazzaniga M. S. (2009) Neuroimaging techniques offer new perspectives on callosal transfer and interhemispheric communication. Cortex. 44 (8): 1023-1029.
245
PuTman M. C. et al. (2009) Cortical projection topography of the human splenium: hemispheric asymmetry and individual difference. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 22 (8): 1662-1669.
246
DEsmuRgET M. et al. (2009) Movement intention after parietal cortex stimulation in humans. Science. 324 (811): 811-813.
247
BRass M., HaggaRd P. (2008) The what, when, whether model of intentional action. Neuroscientist. 14 (4): 319-325.
248
BRass M., HaggaRd P. (2007) To do or not to do: the neural signature of self-control. Journal of Neuroscience. 27 (34): 9141-9145.